<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4/23/08 Opinion - US 5th Cir.</title>
	<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/04/23/42308-opinion-us-5th-cir/</link>
	<description>Focusing on intelligent appellate representation and select litigation matters.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 4/23/08 Opinions - US 5th Cir. (pt.2) &#124; bartlett-legal.com</title>
		<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/04/23/42308-opinion-us-5th-cir/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>4/23/08 Opinions - US 5th Cir. (pt.2) &#124; bartlett-legal.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/04/23/42308-opinion-us-5th-cir/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] following additional published opinions were released by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 23, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] following additional published opinions were released by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 23, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
