<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6/25/08 Opinions - US Supreme Ct.</title>
	<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/06/26/62508-opinions-us-supreme-ct/</link>
	<description>Focusing on intelligent appellate representation and select litigation matters.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 10/1/08 Opinion - US Supreme Ct. &#124; bartlett-legal.com</title>
		<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/06/26/62508-opinions-us-supreme-ct/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>10/1/08 Opinion - US Supreme Ct. &#124; bartlett-legal.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/06/26/62508-opinions-us-supreme-ct/#comment-473</guid>
		<description>[...] October 1, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court released a modified opinion in Kennedy v. Louisiana, continuing to hold on a 5-4 vote (Kennedy, J., joined by Stevens, Souter, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] October 1, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court released a modified opinion in Kennedy v. Louisiana, continuing to hold on a 5-4 vote (Kennedy, J., joined by Stevens, Souter, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
