<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7/2/08 Opinion - US 5th Cir.</title>
	<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/07/02/7208-opinion-us-5th-cir/</link>
	<description>Focusing on intelligent appellate representation and select litigation matters.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 7/15/08 Opinions - US 5th Cir. &#124; bartlett-legal.com</title>
		<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/07/02/7208-opinion-us-5th-cir/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>7/15/08 Opinions - US 5th Cir. &#124; bartlett-legal.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/07/02/7208-opinion-us-5th-cir/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>[...] the Court released a revised version of its opinion released originally on July 2, 2008, in Chicago Bridge &#38; Iron Co. v. FTC.   This entry was written by Tad Bartlett, posted on July [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Court released a revised version of its opinion released originally on July 2, 2008, in Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron Co. v. FTC.   This entry was written by Tad Bartlett, posted on July [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
