<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7/14/08 Opinions - US 5th Cir.</title>
	<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/07/14/71408-opinions-us-5th-cir/</link>
	<description>Focusing on intelligent appellate representation and select litigation matters.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 7/14/08 Opinion - US 5th Cir. (pt. 2) &#124; bartlett-legal.com</title>
		<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/07/14/71408-opinions-us-5th-cir/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>7/14/08 Opinion - US 5th Cir. (pt. 2) &#124; bartlett-legal.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/07/14/71408-opinions-us-5th-cir/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>[...] Focusing on intelligent appellate representation and select litigation matters.    AboutAttorney BioPractice AreasFeesContract ServicesContact      &#171; 7/14/08 Opinions - US 5th Cir. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Focusing on intelligent appellate representation and select litigation matters.    AboutAttorney BioPractice AreasFeesContract ServicesContact      &laquo; 7/14/08 Opinions - US 5th Cir. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Todd Smith</title>
		<link>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/07/14/71408-opinions-us-5th-cir/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Todd Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bartlett-legal.com/2008/07/14/71408-opinions-us-5th-cir/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding the jurisdictional parentheticals to your 5th Circuit summaries, Tad.  That little tidbit of information helps me decide whether to dig deeper into the case.  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding the jurisdictional parentheticals to your 5th Circuit summaries, Tad.  That little tidbit of information helps me decide whether to dig deeper into the case.  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
